preview

Pennsylvania State Academic Competition Unofficial Preview and Chat 2017

pennsylvania_state_capitol_house_chamber

PSAC takes place within the chambers of the PA General Assembly (pictured here) and Senate. Photo credit: Wikipedia.

Welcome to GPQB’s unofficial (we are completely unaffiliated with PSAC or any of the organizers) preview and coverage of the 2017 PSAC!

[Edit: We are updating unofficial scores in this Google Document; you can watch matches beginning again after lunch at 12:45 PM EST via the House stream here; we are continuing to update on Twitter and discuss in the chatroom here.]

Where else will you find a golden-voiced emcee read quality NAQT IS-level tossups alongside random “fanfare” bonus rounds of wildly varying difficulty within the beautifully furnished Pennsylvania House chambers? Where else will you find completely randomly generated schedules for each team’s two (usually!) prelim rounds that lead to extraordinarily unbalanced prelim schedules and playoff matchups based on points scored? Did we mention it’s 3 teams playing at once?

For randomness and ironic amusement value, PSAC is hard to top. Alas, it’s not ideal from a fairness perspective for a number of reasons that we detailed in our wrap-up from last year. But at least thanks to some recent reforms there aren’t tossups from the 1990s still being asked.

The format is…unique. 3 teams compete at once and first play a series of toss-up questions (which will be pyramidal NAQT IS-level questions), then each team gets a series of directed bonuses called “fanfares” that differ for each team. There’s a toss-up round, a fanfare round for each team, another toss-up round, and then a final fanfare round. And then that’s the match. The top 9 teams based on points scored in the prelims advance to the semifinals and the winners of those semis advance to the finals. Again, this is unique.

Thanks to the magic of PCN-TV, the whole competition should be streamable on video for anyone to watch (at least, that’s how it’s been in the past). Check here on Friday morning starting at 9 AM EST for hopefully a link to the video.

[Edit: PCN TV seems to be pay-only now, but you can watch a stream of the matches on the PA House stream here.]

We will be live-chatting over in the #paquizbowl chatroom and live-tweeting via @phillyquizbowl throughout the day on Friday as well starting at 9 AM.  Feel free to join us and send us any tips about match scores and such! We will update this post with a schedule if we can get one.

For newbies, PSAC is sponsored by the Chester County Intermediate Unit and allows each IU from around the state to send one representative to compete for the state title in addition to the defending champion returning from last year (which was Lehigh Valley Academy, who will return to defend their title this year). They decide the representatives in a number of ways, but usually with some kind of tournament–sometimes using pyramidal questions and other best practices, sometimes not.

Who’s representing whom this year? Well, we don’t exactly know yet! Please feel free to comment if you have information on teams competing. But here’s our best guess based on available information (read: searching Twitter and recent news articles):

[Note that some IUs just don’t send representatives sometimes; when not clear how a team got to state, we don’t say]

IU 1: Canon-McMillan

IU 2, Pittsburgh, does not appear to have a representative [this ought to be fixed, posthaste!]

IU 3: Gateway

IUs 4-5, MidWest and NWPA, do not appear to have a representative [this ought to be fixed, posthaste!]

IU 6 (Riverview): Rocky Grove
How They Got Here: Won the Riverview IU Academic Bowl.

IU 7 (Westmoreland): Burrell 

IU 8 (Appalachia): Hollidaysburg Area

IU 9, Seneca Highlands, does not appear to have a representative [this ought to be fixed, posthaste!]

IU 10 (Centre): West Branch
Hot They Got Here: Won a draw

IU 12 (Lincoln): Spring Grove
How They Got Here: Won the IU 12 Academic Competition

IU 13 (Lancaster-Lebanon): Manheim Township
How They Got Here: Won the Lancaster-Lebanon League

IU 14 (Berks County): Wyomissing Area
How They Got Here: Won the Berks IU Academic Challenge

IU 15 (Capital Area): Cedar Cliff 
How They Got Here: Won the Capital Area IU Academic Competition

IUs 16: Lewisburg Area

IU 17:  No Info Found

IU 18: Wyoming Area 

IU 19: Lakeland 

IU 20 (Colonial): Bethlehem Catholic
How They Got Here: Won the Colonial IU Academic Competition 

IU 21 (Carbon-Lehigh): Whitehall
How They Got Here: Won the Carbon-Lehigh Academic Competition

IU 22 (Bucks County): Council Rock North

IU 23 (Montgomery County): Upper Dublin
How They Got Here: Won the Montgomery County IU Academic Competition

IU 24 (Chester County): Great Valley
How They Got Here: Won the Chester County Intermediate IU’s Academic Competition

IU 25 (Delaware County): Haverford
How They Got Here: Won the Delaware Hi-Q Competition

IU 26 (Philadelphia): Friends Select
How They Got Here: Won the Philadelphia City Championships 

IU 27: No Info Found

IU 28: Armstrong 
How They Got Here: Won the Indiana County Academic League

IU 29 (Schuylkill League): Blue Mountain 
How They Got Here: Won the Schuylkill League Academic Bowl

How will these teams do at PSAC? Well, with the uncertainty (many of these teams rarely, if ever, play pyramidal quizbowl tournaments outside of their league) and randomness in the scheduling it’s basically anyone’s game. Here are the teams that we know of competing who are ranked in the Morlan national rankings and/or in our GPQB mid-season poll (note that 6 of the top 10 teams in the GPQB poll are not competing at PSAC):

Lehigh Valley Academy: 12th nationally, 2nd in PA
Manheim Township: 43rd nationally, 1st in PA
Great Valley: 94th nationally, 3rd in PA
Friends Select: 162nd nationally, 9th in PA
Lakeland: 11th in PA

That said, Blue Mountain always trains hard and finished a surprising 3rd last year at PSAC (wish they would come to some more tournaments!) and Haverford did quite well earlier this year in the JV division at Great Valley’s tournament. We don’t have very good data on the other teams for the most part, but anyone could surprise. We hope that all these teams from areas outside of the centers of quizbowl around the state will come to more weekend tournaments next year–we’d absolutely love to welcome y’all and answer any questions about the wider world of quizbowl!

Advertisements

2016 NAQT High School National Championship Tournament Preview for Pennsylvania

anatole_1_ns_2048x1024

The 2016 HSNCT will take place at the Hilton Anatole in Dallas, TX. Image from the Hilton Anatole website.

14 quizbowl teams from Pennsylvania will be making the Great Trek out to Dallas, TX for NAQT’s High School National Championship Tournament. As we explained in our guide to the quizbowl national championships, HSNCT is the largest national championship at 272 teams and has the distinction of being the only one using timed rounds.

These teams have qualified by finishing in the top 15% at various quizbowl tournaments around the state and it’s quite impressive just how many teams from PA are attending. A solid majority of those PA teams who qualified have elected to make the trip and see how they stack up against the best teams from around the country. Perhaps the main inital goal for all of these teams is simply to make the playoffs and survive into the second day of competition. To do that, they need to win a majority of their 10 prelim matches on Saturday to got at least 6-4 (and ideally 7-3 or better, since that gives teams double-elimination on Sunday). Check on Twitter and NAQT’s website for results throughout the day on Saturday. 

In reverse alphabetical order, here are brief capsule summaries, completely-for-fun predictions, and a motivational musical track for each team, courtesy of Chris and Ben. Remember, the questions at HSNCT are considerably more difficult than at regular season tournaments and the unique timed matches format rewards some familiarity and experience with the rules, so that will be informing our analysis here. 

Winchester Thurston (Pittsburgh)

B: Winchester Thurston is a very balanced squad that has played under-strength at many of this season’s events. Jack Chaillet is their star, and was the most consistently strong player in Western PA this season. They lack depth, but make up for it in breadth with few weak subjects. I don’t foresee a playoff run at this level, but Winchester Thurston will be consistent and is likely to be competitive in almost every game.

C: A perennial HSNCT attendee, WT this year lacks the deep history knowledge that led to their top-25 run a few years ago, but they continue their trend of having a strong generalist player who might be in contention for a tournament all-star spot. They should still have a respectable outing, likely finishing in the middle of the pack.

Motivational Track: Jimmy Eat World, The Middle

State College B

B: A sleeper pick. While they’re not as consistent as their A team, when they get rolling, State College B has shown the ability to curb-stomp strong opponents and pull an upset. It will take a couple such upsets to make it to Sunday, but unlikely runs have happened in the past.

C: The next batch of State Collegers is always one to watch, but it’s tough to get a read on just how good they’ll be based on a limited track record.

Motivational Track: Cannonball Aderly and Milt Jackson, Things Are Getting Better

State College A

B: There are few safer bets in American Quizbowl than State College being strong. This is the team most likely to see critical contributions from every player at HSNCT, and they have no weaknesses to speak of. Though the schedule of out of state teams is strong and this isn’t a top-20 team in the country as it has been in years past, this is a team that will have some playoff wins.

C: Pennsylvania’s only previous national championship winners, SC A looks to be rounding into solid form by the time of HSNCT with a balanced lineup and the trademark State College depth. A playoff run seems likely, though it’s tough to tell how deep; we haven’t seen SC travel much this year so it’s hard to get a read for how they’ll compare to the championship teams of yore.

 Motivational Track: Queen, We Are the Champions

Manheim Township B (Lancaster)

B: Last year, Manheim Township B had two teams in the playoffs. Can they repeat? Aaron Zuo is a great player who would be on the A squad of any other team, and the rest of these players have put up nice performances this season. This B team is probably about the same strength as last year’s, and will probably fall right about on the “in-or-out of the playoffs” line.

C: Don’t underestimate a competent, balanced, experienced team. The hard-working MT B team is just as experienced as their A team and should be one of the best B teams in the country outside of schools not from Detroit or Austin.

Motivational Track: Daft Punk, Harder Better Faster Stronger

Manheim Township A

B: Manheim Township picked up serious pyramidal quizbowl about 4 seasons ago and have rolled with it ever since. This year features their best lineup yet. Jake, Ahan, Shayar, and Garett have traveled the megalopolis, tried college events, decimated most local competition, and are poised to make a run. They have made the playoffs several times, but this time I foresee a deep run with multiple playoff victories possible. This is a sure top 50 and fringe top 20 team.

C: This Manheim Township A team is loaded for bear. They’ve got a home-run literature threat in Jake who can get powers against any team in the country. They’ve got solid specialists in all areas and are very fast on the buzzers. Do they have the overall depth needed to get the powers against the top teams that they’ll need to make a playoff run?  They’re well-traveled, they’ve played harder questions at tournaments like Penn Bowl, and they’re very experienced in pyramidal QB now. This is their best shot that they’ve yet had at a deep playoff run. 

Motivational Track: Hamilton Cast, My Shot

Indiana Area

B: Indiana lost most of their big guns from a 4-6 go at HSNCT last year. They took some time to adjust to this loss, but they do seem to have consistently improved throughout the season, qualifying for HSNCT by the end. This won’t be an especially threatening team, but they should win a few games and continue bulking up for next year.

C: It’s always good to see teams coming back to the national championships! You can make these trips into a great learning experience, especially since they tend to rotate between some major cities like Chicago, Atlanta, and Dallas from year to year (next year’s HSNCT is in Atlanta, FYI). Indiana Area was a solid competitor on the Western PA circuit this year, but they’ll likely be looking to use this experience to salute their seniors and prep for next year. 

Motivational Track: Stronger, Kelly Clarkson

Huntingdon Area

B: This will be the second regular difficulty and up event for a program that just started this year. Considering this, HSNCT might be a bit rough for these relatively inexperienced players. Huntington should enjoy the Dallas weather and enjoy the fruits of a very impressive first season in the circuit, with the chance to build a strong program.

C: Good to see them making the trek out to HSNCT and for garnering some local media coverage. The step-up in question difficulty might be really jarring though considering their limited experience; this will be a bit of trial-by-fire. One of the nice things about HSNCT though is how much practice you can get–scrimmages on Friday night, prelim games on Saturday, and consolation games on Sunday–so hopefully this will be both a fun trip for them and a learning experience for the future. 

Motivational Track: Guns N’ Roses, Welcome to the Jungle

Henderson (West Chester)

B: Henderson, after an overdue delay of seven seasons qualified, will be debuting at HSNCT this year. Henderson is a fiery team, prone to negging too much but capable of powering lots of questions. The late career emergence of David Smoczynski into a power player on several categories has been fun, and he will do well. To me, Henderson’s performance will be determined by how well Alex, Ashish, and Nick scale up. If they are able to perform in their areas, Henderson will do very well, if not, they will struggle. I see a 5-5 record, but they may have an upset up their sleeves.

Disclaimer: Ben is a Henderson alum

C: The state runners-up . How will the difficulty jump from the regular season to nationals affect them? Each team member has good pockets of knowledge, but will it be enough to vault them into the playoffs? One interesting thing about the HSNCT schedule is that you get a huge number of teams at 5-5 since you’re usually playing a team with the same record as you every round, so there’s often a large clump of teams. I fear this might be Henderson’s fate, though they’ll be fighting for that playoff spot to the very end.

Motivational Track: Queen, Under Pressure

Great Valley (Malvern)

B: Great Valley should do well. This is another Chester County team that negs too much, but they have shown better skills at regular difficulty and up than Henderson. Lead by GPQB honorable mention players Sam and Deakon, GV performs well in most areas, with history a particular strength. GV is sturdy enough to stomach the difficulty jump, though not as smoothly as State College or Manheim Township. The knowledge is there; if they can avoid bad negs, this is a team that should make the playoffs.

C: Will they share the same fate as their Chester County neighbors or will they get into the finals? I’d label this team as having a higher ceiling, but a lower floor compared to Henderson and they could neg themselves out of the playoffs or upset a higher-ranked team any given match. The good news for this team is that a lot of their firepower returns next year.

Motivational Track: Scarface, Push It To The Limit 

Friends Select B (Philadelphia)

B: I don’t know much about this team, but they did very well at the Philadelphia City Championship. Coming off the waitlist late, they are something of a wildcard. It’s great to see so many Pennsylvania students interested in stepping up to nationals!

C: The future of FSS (since their A team is all seniors) just got off the standby list and into the field–though they qualified on their own at the Philly City Champs earlier in the year, falling only to their own A team. They bring surprising breadth even though they’ll likely play as a two-man team, but they’ve been a bit overmatched when playing against elite teams this year. Richard notably brings solid music knowledge to the table.

Motivational Track: Fleetwood Mac, Don’t Stop

Friends Select A (Philadelphia) 

B: Every year, Pennsylvania seems to have a brand new program that discovers pyramidal quizbowl, hits the ground running, and performs extremely well at nationals (2014 Downingtown East, 2015 Emmaus). This year, I believe Friends Select will inherit that tradition. They’ve been a solid team all season since starting in December, and I think they’ll make it all the way to the middle of this nationals pack. Great coverage for such a new team, especially in RMP.

C: At most tournaments this year, FSS A has been in the championship brackets yet finished a step behind the top teams in the region, but have shown consistent improvement throughout the year. They did play MUT (an undergraduate college tournament), so they definitely should have an idea of what they’re up against difficulty-wise. They have solid depth on several subject areas, so expect a decent number of powers, but the extent of their studying to fill in their gap areas will be the key determinant of whether or not they make the playoffs.

Motivational Track: The Beatles, With a Little Help from my Friends

DuBois Area

B: DuBois has been under the radar a bit in Pennsylvania this year, which is unfair. GPQB all-star Eli Kirk can uncork many powers a game, and does especially well at the NAQT categories. His teammates help out on bonuses, get good buzzes in many areas, and compete as a strong product. This isn’t a playoff contender in my mind, but DuBois will do Central Pennsylvania proud and win 4 or 5 games.

C: Eli Kirk and friends will make a welcome HSNCT return for the venerable DuBois program, but with their last HSNCT coming in 2012 this should be an all-new experience for the players. While they’ve feasted on easier questions and relatively weak fields at Western PA tournaments, HSNCT will considerably up the ante. 5-5 would be a solid goal. They’ll need some heroics from Eli if they want to get beyond that. 

Motivational Track: Bonnie Tyler, I Need a Hero

Cedar Crest B (Lebanon Co.)

B: Unusually for B teams, this one is heavy on the seniors. They had a solid year finishing in the upper half at most Eastern events this season. I can’t remember any especially noteworthy single match performances from this team, despite reading for them a good bit. HSNCT will be a nice reward for years of hard work, and they’ll get some good games in the books.

C: Cedar Crest has established a very deep program that’s ended up senior-heavy this year, but seems to have a solid foundation for the future. They’re also no strangers to the difficulty of HSNCT and seem to be up for the grueling competition. Like their A team, this is a solid across-the-board team that’s better at bonuses than TUs. 

Motivational Track: Michael Bolton, Go The Distance 

Cedar Crest A (Lebanon Co.):

B: Pennsylvania has a lot of power-strong, neg-happy teams near the top this year. Cedar Crest has been the opposite- solid on bonuses, beat out too often on the buzzer. This will hurt in the fast paced, quick buzzing nationals style unless they leave their comfort zone. That being said, this is a team with four real contributors and good coaching. They will not be the victims of any upsets since they will not create windows with mistakes. Cedar Crest went 3-7 two years ago, and 4-6 last year. I think bettering that is a good possibility.

C: A veteran team that’s rolled with the punches all year. They are balanced, good on bonuses, but surprisingly conservative on tossups–and that might come back to haunt them at HSNCT where getting questions at the giveaway is somewhat more common due to the difficulty of the questions. Perhaps they might as well take a guess on a few more TUs earlier. 

Motivational Track: Van Halen, Jump 

Alagar Homeschool (Pittsburgh)

B: The Alagar family has been a welcome addition to the larger Pennsylvania quizbowl family. Despite being mostly the age of underclassmen at other high schools, the Alagars pull off some really impressive buzzes, in lit and history especially. Though I don’t see a playoff berth yet, these guys are very dangerous and will scale up to nationals difficulty really well. As they get older and study more things, this will be one of Pennsylvania’s top teams next year.

C: Clearly an enthusiastic bunch that’s only going to get better in future years, it’s good to see a homeschooled team getting so involved in quizbowl and making the trip out to nationals. Hopefully other homeschool groups might follow in the Alagars’ path in the future.  

Motivational Track: Pink Floyd, Another Brick in the Wall (Part 2)

 

Pennsylvania State Academic Competition (PSAC) Preview

This Friday, April 29th, the Pennsylvania State Academic Competition–sponsored by the Chester County Intermediate Unit and supported by the Pennsylvania State Education Association–will be held in the state capital building in Harrisburg. 22 schools representing various intermediate units from around the state will compete for what is essentially the state quizbowl championship.

(Note: GPQB is not affiliated with any of the organizers of PSAC, so please consider this preview fully “unofficial”)

We at GPQB had some issues with last year’s PSAC, but this year some of our major concerns looked to be ameliorated through the use of NAQT’s IS-156 question set for the tossups. This is a major, major improvement that makes the competition more fair and more academically rewarding to all participants, and we salute the CCIU organizers for making the change.

PSAC will still use the CCIU format though for its matches. For those not familiar with this format, each match consists of 3 teams playing at once through 2 rounds total. Each round contains 10 standard quizbowl-style “tossup” questions that all teams can buzz in on and this is followed by “fanfare” questions directed at each team. Fanfare questions are similar to the “60-second rounds” that you might see at History Bowl, basically a series of bonus questions that an individual team has to respond to within a minute. Teams play only 2 prelim matches (since the matches are held in the Senate and House chambers) and then get placed into 3 semifinals of 3 teams each based on their total points, with the winners of those semifinals advancing to a final.

While the tossups will be pyramidal questions, we’re still not sure to what degree the fanfare questions will be effectively balanced in terms of difficulty. As we pointed out in our coverage of last year’s PSAC, imbalances in the fanfare rounds are a problem because getting an unusually hard or easy set of fanfare questions can have a huge influence on the outcome as teams each get a separate fanfare round and each fanfare question counts as much as a tossup.

The 3-way matches, randomized schedule (there’s no seeding), unique scoring system, and relatively few matches all combine to introduce a strong amount of randomness to the results at PSAC, much more so than a standard quizbowl tournament that uses seeded pools and matched round-robins.

Nevertheless, this is the largest all-state field of the year and given that the tossups should be pyramidal, we’re going to be rooting for all the teams to do well and showcase the best of PA’s secondary education.

Last year’s competition streamed live on PCN TV. We’re not sure if it will happen again this year, but you can check this link to see on Friday.

Also follow us on Twitter @phillyquizbowl for updates throughout the day.

Team-by-Team Preview:

We’re primarily basing this preview on the information that we could find on quizbowl tournament attendance and results, since stats like points-per-bonus allow us to compare teams across fields in a way that other types of tournaments like many local IU competitions don’t when they just report points.

Feel free to comment with any info or your own predictions. We’d love to hear more about your teams! Of course, we’d also love to see all of these schools at more quizbowl tournaments next year across the state.

Each of the teams represents a different part of the state defined by Pennsylvania’s Intermediate Units. Here’s a map of the state IU system for reference.

IU-1: Canon-McMillan (Canonsburg)
No quizbowl record.

IU-3: Gateway High School (Monroeville)
No quizbowl record.

IU-6: DuBois Area
A rapidly improving team lead by GPQB Second Team All-Stater Eli Kirk from Northwest PA. Though not the strongest team on pyramidal questions, they’re definitely a threat to make the semifinals and could play spoiler on the right questions to any other team in the field.

IU-8: Altoona Area
Back in 2012, Altoona played several quizbowl tournaments at both the high school and middle school levels, but their attendance has dropped off since then, so they’re coming in as a bit of a mystery. Some of their players may still have that experience though.

IU-10: State College Area
Normally, Pennsylvania’s resident quizbowl dynasty would be the favorites to win. But our sources say that this won’t be State College’s A team or even their B, C, or D team–this is basically their E team (which is still quite good) of freshmen.

IU-12: Spring Grove Area
No quizbowl record. 

IU-13: Manheim Township (Lancaster)
When your team has 2 First-Team All-Staters and 1 Second-Team All-Stater, you’re probably the favorite to win the tournament. But with the random scheduling and fanfare rounds, who knows what might happen?

IU-14: Wyomissing Area (Reading)
No recent quizbowl record.

IU-15: Dauphin County Tech (Harrisburg)
No quizbowl record.

IU-16: Berwick
An enthusiastic newcomer to the quizbowl circuit in the past few years, Berwick is a team on the upswing, but could use a bit more seasoning. Probably not a semifinalist, but not a pushover either.

IU-18: Wyoming Area (Exeter)
Plays History Bowl and also competed at Tri-State Tussle and Brainbusters earlier this year, but struggled a bit at both.

IU-19: Honesdale.
Plays WVIA Scholastic Scrimmage, but otherwise not much info.

IU-20: Lehigh Valley Academy (Bethlehem)
Last year’s JV player of the year and this year’s overall player of the year, Alex Schmidt, will make his PSAC debut this year before heading off to Chicago to compete at the Small School National Championships this weekend. LVA may be the only team in the field capable of taking down Manheim under normal quizbowl conditions, but these aren’t normal quizbowl conditions so anything could happen. LVA still has an excellent shot at the final though so long as they can adapt to the CCIU-style.

IU-21: Allentown Central Catholic (Allentown)
No recent quizbowl records.

IU-22: Central Bucks East (Doylestown)
The CB East team is stronger than ever this year, with solid performances on pyramidal questions at QFO in December and Great Valley in February. They’ve got a good shot at a semifinal if they get manageable matches, but probably not into the finals this year.

IU-23: Souderton Area
Last year’s Souderton team had a remarkably strong debut in their first quizbowl tournaments ever. They disappeared from the quizbowl circuit this year though, so we don’t have much info on them other than that they won their local IU competition in MontCo. Likely a strong team though and potentially a semifinalist.

IU-24: Henderson (West Chester)
This veteran team  is perhaps the team most prepared to adjust to the competition’s changes this year thanks to their years of competing on both CCIU in their local league and in quizbowl tournaments. Along with Manheim Township and LVA, they have a good shot at making the finals this year.

IU-24: Downingtown East
A solid team that’s been competing in more quizbowl tournaments throughout the year, but has struggled a bit against the top teams. They made it back to PSAC this year by virtue of being the defending champion. Could make a semifinal run, especially given the rapid improvement of their lead scorer Jackie, but not likely to defend their title.

IU-25: Garnet Valley (Glen Mills)
The champions of DelCo Hi-Q venture out of their county for the first time this year. Although both test academic knowledge, quizbowl is a very different format from Hi-Q, which remains more similar to its roots as a radio quiz show. A bit of a wild card, but good to see them and hope they’ll come to more quizbowl tournaments throughout the year next year.

IU-26: Friends Select (Philadelphia)
New to quizbowl entirely this year, but have improved a good bit over the year and they’ve got the raw firepower to hang with some of the top teams here. The CCIU format will be something new for them and they haven’t played much on IS-level questions, so while they’re a likely semifinalist they’ll need a few breaks for a shot at the final.

IU-28: Indiana Area
Also competed in a number of pyramidal tournaments this year and will be heading to HSNCT in May. Increasingly strong results throughout the year, capped off by a win at UPitt in March. Good bet for a semifinal berth.

IU-29: Blue Mountain (Schuykill Haven)
Took down perennial league champ Schuykill Haven to earn the bid to states. Not much other information about them, but they seem to have competed on pyramidal questions in the past as part of their league.

IU-2, 4, 5, 9, 11,17, and 27 are not listed as sending representatives.